Seat Belt Laws and Abortion Are The Same?

by Ben 28. October 2009 15:57

I was reading an article by Michael Durbin about whether it is a right not to wear a seatbelt. He seems to claim that people do not have a right to choose whether to wear a seatbelt, or not. Then, most outrageously he compares it to abortion. Abortion!? I guess if you view an unborn baby as a means to an end, much like a car, you might get that idea. Then he gives the following scenario.

Consider this scenario to justify how someone loses liberty when a person doesn't wear a seat belt. If you have two identical accidents, let's take a truck flipped over while hill topping for example, in one the driver IS wearing their seat belt and the other the driver ISN'T. The overwhelming evidence shows that the driver not wearing a seat belt will suffer more injury than the driver who did wear their belt, most of the time. So the driver who did not wear a seat belt will take more of the liberty of those who have to provide care to him, in the form of their labor. He will require more attention, from the first responders to the hospital staff, because of more extensive injuries that occur.

 He claims that the driver who doesn't wear the seatbelt is TAKING the liberty of the people that come to his aid. Really? Is there a law in Missouri that forces people to tend to other peoples injuries? Is the person that is caring for the injured person at liberty to not do that type of work? Furthermore, isn't that person at liberty to refuse to help that person? Is Missouri a communist state? Are people forced into labor in Missouri?

Oh wait, he compared it to abortion. Perhaps, the injured person will slice the arms and legs off of the rescue worker and cover him with acid in an effort to MURDER that person. Maybe, that is what he means. WOW! If that is what happens to rescue workers in Missouri, then I absolutely do not want to go to Missouri. Sounds like a very dangerous place.

This type of rhetoric is the same stupid political lies and simply stupid illogical...man, I can't even classify it as an argument because it is so worthless. It is a pathetic attempt to guilt people into turning over their freedoms and liberties by creating a false victim.

People, politicians in particular, should be blasted, laughed at, and ridiculed every time they make up these invalid claims as a means to further erode the rights, freedoms, and liberties of U.S. citizens. Michael Durbin should be embarrassed for even making such a inept case in public.

Tags: , ,

Constitution

Comments

10/27/2009 5:09:03 PM #

Wow. Your twist on my blog is an interesting one. Did you watch the videos I posted in the article regarding liberty? If so, did you catch that a person's labor is a product of their liberty? In Missouri, a first responder can't come upon an emergency and, while in the line of duty, choose not to help those who need it. Would you want it any other way? Can you imagine a first responder coming upon an accident and saying, "Nope, that guy is a conservative. I don't believe what he does so I don't have to help him." Your state laws may be different, but I doubt it. Secondly, the seat belt is a safety device. Are you screaming that your liberties are being lost because your car has to have headlights and turn signals to operate on public roads? It's the same thing. My philosophy when making decisions in my elected position is to find ways to minimize or all together keep from taking liberties and hopefully restore liberties in some cases. So when 1 in 4 trauma patients who are NOT wearing their seatbelt in my town are on medicare or don't pay the hospital bill after an accident forcing others to spend their money on them, while only 1 in 10 who are wearing their seatbelt are a drain on others liberty by being on medicare or not paying, there is a much larger drain on the system by those who simply don't use a vehicle's safety device. Either way I decide on this issue I would take someone's liberty. Either I take the liberty of the driver to choose whether or not to wear a seatbelt, or I choose to take the liberty of the people who have to serve them both medically and financially. Frankly I see it as the lesser of two evils. You may disagree, but that doesn't make me embarrassed or my case inept.

More importantly, it concerns me that you can plainly see that I am conservative. You have obviously read my blog and you follow me on twitter, so you can see my views are consistently conservative. I see you are conservative as well, from what I've read here. Why attack a fellow conservative on ONE issue we disagree on and encourage others to "blast, laugh at and ridicule"? Wouldn't our efforts to further the cause of freedom be better served attacking those who take our liberties constantly and obviously without the consideration of minimizing the interference of government in our lives?

Also, as far as the abortion position, from what you have said can I assume you are pro-choice then? My point was that if you state government shouldn't interfere with personal liberties whatsoever, you are a libertarian. With that belief comes a person's "liberty" to choose to kill an unborn child. I stated in my blog that is what separates conservatives from libertarians and was stated in the videos. Conservatives agree that a person's "liberty" to an abortion should be eliminated because it interferes with another person's liberty to life. Again, it's the lesser of two evils. Either way someone's liberty is lost. Limited government that protects people's fundamental rights and liberty make everyone more free.

Thank you for reading my blog. I look forward to reading yours in the future.

Michael Durbin United States

10/29/2009 3:22:25 AM #

Thank you for responding to my article. I want to reply to your comment in an article that I am writing now. I apologize for the delay in responding. I consider what you say important, but I have regularly scheduled things I needed to attend to first.

Ben United States

10/30/2009 2:01:37 AM #

Here is my reply.

www.bengehring.com/.../What-Is-A-Conservative.aspx

Ben United States

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Theme by Extensive SEO